linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.19 170/191] rbd: work around -Wuninitialized warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200221072311.089769997@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 21 Feb 2020 08:42:23 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 170/191] rbd: work around -Wuninitialized warning

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>

[ Upstream commit a55e601b2f02df5db7070e9a37bd655c9c576a52 ]

gcc -O3 warns about a dummy variable that is passed
down into rbd_img_fill_nodata without being initialized:

drivers/block/rbd.c: In function 'rbd_img_fill_nodata':
drivers/block/rbd.c:2573:13: error: 'dummy' is used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=uninitialized]
  fctx->iter = *fctx->pos;

Since this is a dummy, I assume the warning is harmless, but
it's better to initialize it anyway and avoid the warning.

Fixes: mmtom ("init/Kconfig: enable -O3 for all arches")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Reviewed-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/block/rbd.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/rbd.c b/drivers/block/rbd.c
index b942f4c8cea8c..d3ad1b8c133e6 100644
--- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
+++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
@@ -2097,7 +2097,7 @@ static int rbd_img_fill_nodata(struct rbd_img_request *img_req,
 			       u64 off, u64 len)
 {
 	struct ceph_file_extent ex = { off, len };
-	union rbd_img_fill_iter dummy;
+	union rbd_img_fill_iter dummy = {};
 	struct rbd_img_fill_ctx fctx = {
 		.pos_type = OBJ_REQUEST_NODATA,
 		.pos = &dummy,
-- 
2.20.1