linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.4 285/344] btrfs: separate definition of assertion failure handlers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200221072415.665374073@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 21 Feb 2020 08:41:24 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 285/344] btrfs: separate definition of assertion failure handlers

From: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>

[ Upstream commit 68c467cbb2f389b6c933e235bce0d1756fc8cc34 ]

There's a report where objtool detects unreachable instructions, eg.:

  fs/btrfs/ctree.o: warning: objtool: btrfs_search_slot()+0x2d4: unreachable instruction

This seems to be a false positive due to compiler version. The cause is
in the ASSERT macro implementation that does the conditional check as
IS_DEFINED(CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT) and not an #ifdef.

To avoid that, use the ifdefs directly.

There are still 2 reports that aren't fixed:

  fs/btrfs/extent_io.o: warning: objtool: __set_extent_bit()+0x71f: unreachable instruction
  fs/btrfs/relocation.o: warning: objtool: find_data_references()+0x4e0: unreachable instruction

Co-developed-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 20 ++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
index 290ca193c6c0f..169075550a5a2 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
@@ -3107,17 +3107,21 @@ do {								\
 	rcu_read_unlock();					\
 } while (0)
 
-__cold
-static inline void assfail(const char *expr, const char *file, int line)
+#ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT
+__cold __noreturn
+static inline void assertfail(const char *expr, const char *file, int line)
 {
-	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT)) {
-		pr_err("assertion failed: %s, in %s:%d\n", expr, file, line);
-		BUG();
-	}
+	pr_err("assertion failed: %s, in %s:%d\n", expr, file, line);
+	BUG();
 }
 
-#define ASSERT(expr)	\
-	(likely(expr) ? (void)0 : assfail(#expr, __FILE__, __LINE__))
+#define ASSERT(expr)						\
+	(likely(expr) ? (void)0 : assertfail(#expr, __FILE__, __LINE__))
+
+#else
+static inline void assertfail(const char *expr, const char* file, int line) { }
+#define ASSERT(expr)	(void)(expr)
+#endif
 
 /*
  * Use that for functions that are conditionally exported for sanity tests but
-- 
2.20.1