[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGETcx_yQZtU4O2KgMxVt-hSJCBtNsOpyWsSXc+OZcjjJ91M3g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 01:48:49 -0800
From: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] driver core: Call sync_state() even if supplier
has no consumers
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 1:25 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 12:05:08AM -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > The initial patch that added sync_state() support didn't handle the case
> > where a supplier has no consumers. This was because when a device is
> > successfully bound with a driver, only its suppliers were checked to see
> > if they are eligible to get a sync_state(). This is not sufficient for
> > devices that have no consumers but still need to do device state clean
> > up. So fix this.
> >
> > Fixes: fc5a251d0fd7ca90 (driver core: Add sync_state driver/bus callback)
>
> Should be:
> Fixes: fc5a251d0fd7 ("driver core: Add sync_state driver/bus callback")
Sorry, late night sleepy patches are never good!
Btw I thought the sha should be only 12 characters but then saw
another instance where you used 16 chars. What's the right one?
>
> > Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
>
> So this needs to go to 5.5 also, right?
Did you mean 5.4? Yes.
-Saravana
Powered by blists - more mailing lists