[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdXy=B6ZjC=X12yeOjSfr5-Z6HNL4vp0vQciMsW31i-CPw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 10:54:18 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
Cc: Linux I2C <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-i3c@...ts.infradead.org,
Kieran Bingham <kieran@...uared.org.uk>,
Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@...natech.se>,
Luca Ceresoli <luca@...aceresoli.net>,
Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@...ndi.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/7] i2c: of: error message unification
Hi Wolfram,
Thanks for your patch!
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 6:26 PM Wolfram Sang
<wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com> wrote:
> - don't prefix the device if %pOF is provided. That information is
> enough.
While that information is sufficient to identify the device, using a mix
of dev_*() and pr_*("... %pOF...") makes it harder to grep for relevant
information in the kernel log. Hence I'm not convinced this is an
improvement.
> - move the prefix to pr_fmt
> - change prefix from "of_i2c" to "i2c_of" because the code was moved
> out of the of-domain long ago
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
Nevertheless:
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists