lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200221113000.GC2902@twin.jikos.cz>
Date:   Fri, 21 Feb 2020 12:30:00 +0100
From:   David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
        Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the btrfs tree

On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 09:23:44AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> After merging the btrfs tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> 
> fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c: In function 'btrfs_alloc_logged_file_extent':
> fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4425:20: error: passing argument 1 of 'btrfs_pin_extent' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
>  4425 |   btrfs_pin_extent(fs_info, ins->objectid, ins->offset, 1);
>       |                    ^~~~~~~
>       |                    |
>       |                    struct btrfs_fs_info *
> fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:2609:49: note: expected 'struct btrfs_trans_handle *' but argument is of type 'struct btrfs_fs_info *'
>  2609 | int btrfs_pin_extent(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>       |                      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~
> 
> Caused by commit
> 
>   4e2c2f96e6a3 ("btrfs: Make btrfs_pin_extent take trans handle")
> 
> interacting with commit
> 
>   bd727173e443 ("btrfs: handle logged extent failure properly")
> 
> from the btrfs-fixes tree.
> 
> I have applied the following merge fix patch for today.

Sorry, I'll fix the branch in the next for-next snapshot.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ