linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] irqchip: xilinx: Use handle_domain

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2333cecb-06f5-cd9e-8c11-bb2d16ebbfa2@xilinx.com>
Date:   Fri, 21 Feb 2020 12:49:42 +0100
From:   Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
To:     Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, monstr@...str.eu, git@...inx.com,
        Stefan Asserhall <stefan.asserhall@...inx.com>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] irqchip: xilinx: Use handle_domain_irq()

On 21. 02. 20 12:46, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 2020-02-12 08:39, Michal Simek wrote:
>> Call generic domain specific irq handler which does the most of things
>> self. Also get rid of concurrent_irq counting which hasn't been exported
>> anywhere.
>> Based on this loop was also optimized by using do/while loop instead of
>> goto loop.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Stefan Asserhall <stefan.asserhall@...inx.com>
>> ---
>>
>>  arch/microblaze/Kconfig           |  1 +
>>  arch/microblaze/kernel/irq.c      |  5 ----
>>  drivers/irqchip/irq-xilinx-intc.c | 44 +++++++++++--------------------
>>  3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/microblaze/Kconfig b/arch/microblaze/Kconfig
>> index 3a314aa2efa1..242f58ec086b 100644
>> --- a/arch/microblaze/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/microblaze/Kconfig
>> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ config MICROBLAZE
>>      select MMU_GATHER_NO_RANGE if MMU
>>      select SPARSE_IRQ
>>      select GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER
>> +    select HANDLE_DOMAIN_IRQ
>>
>>  # Endianness selection
>>  choice
>> diff --git a/arch/microblaze/kernel/irq.c b/arch/microblaze/kernel/irq.c
>> index 1f8cb4c4f74f..0b37dde60a1e 100644
>> --- a/arch/microblaze/kernel/irq.c
>> +++ b/arch/microblaze/kernel/irq.c
>> @@ -22,13 +22,8 @@
>>
>>  void __irq_entry do_IRQ(struct pt_regs *regs)
>>  {
>> -    struct pt_regs *old_regs = set_irq_regs(regs);
>>      trace_hardirqs_off();
>> -
>> -    irq_enter();
>>      handle_arch_irq(regs);
>> -    irq_exit();
>> -    set_irq_regs(old_regs);
>>      trace_hardirqs_on();
>>  }
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-xilinx-intc.c
>> b/drivers/irqchip/irq-xilinx-intc.c
>> index ad9e678c24ac..fa468e618762 100644
>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-xilinx-intc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-xilinx-intc.c
>> @@ -125,20 +125,6 @@ static unsigned int xintc_get_irq_local(struct
>> xintc_irq_chip *irqc)
>>      return irq;
>>  }
>>
>> -static unsigned int xintc_get_irq(void)
>> -{
>> -    u32 hwirq;
>> -    unsigned int irq = -1;
>> -
>> -    hwirq = xintc_read(primary_intc, IVR);
>> -    if (hwirq != -1U)
>> -        irq = irq_find_mapping(primary_intc->root_domain, hwirq);
>> -
>> -    pr_debug("irq-xilinx: hwirq=%d, irq=%d\n", hwirq, irq);
>> -
>> -    return irq;
>> -}
>> -
>>  static int xintc_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq,
>> irq_hw_number_t hw)
>>  {
>>      struct xintc_irq_chip *irqc = d->host_data;
>> @@ -178,23 +164,23 @@ static void xil_intc_irq_handler(struct irq_desc
>> *desc)
>>      chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
>>  }
>>
>> -static u32 concurrent_irq;
>> -
>>  static void xil_intc_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
>>  {
>> -    unsigned int irq;
>> -
>> -    irq = xintc_get_irq();
>> -next_irq:
>> -    BUG_ON(!irq);
>> -    generic_handle_irq(irq);
>> -
>> -    irq = xintc_get_irq();
>> -    if (irq != -1U) {
>> -        pr_debug("next irq: %d\n", irq);
>> -        ++concurrent_irq;
>> -        goto next_irq;
>> -    }
>> +    u32 hwirq;
>> +    struct xintc_irq_chip *irqc = primary_intc;
>> +
>> +    do {
>> +        hwirq = xintc_read(irqc, IVR);
>> +        if (hwirq != -1U) {
>> +            int ret;
>> +
>> +            ret = handle_domain_irq(irqc->root_domain, hwirq, regs);
>> +            WARN_ONCE(ret, "Unhandled HWIRQ %d\n", hwirq);
>> +            continue;
>> +        }
>> +
>> +        break;
>> +    } while (1);
> 
> OK, so this what I suggested already. Just squash the two patches
> in one, there is no point in keeping them separate.

I sent it exactly how I have done it originally. Not a problem with
squashing that stuff together.

Thanks,
Michal