[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200221123813.GB5546@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 12:38:13 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] regulator: max14577: Add proper dt-compatible strings
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 11:44:03AM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> On 20.02.2020 17:56, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Why would we want to encode the particular way Linux happens to
> > represent regulators on a MFD into the DT binding? It's not clear that
> > this is a generic thing (another OS might choose to have a separate
> > object for each regulator with no parent for example) and the compatible
> > isn't adding any information we didn't have already knowing about the
> > parent device.
> Well, that's how the bindings for max14577/max77836 are defined:
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/max14577.txt
> I've only fixed regulator, charger and extcon drivers to match the cells
> created by the current mfd driver.
We could just remove the compatible strings from the binding
documentation, they won't do any harm if we don't use them.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists