[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200221130903.GC652992@krava>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:09:03 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: acme@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
namhyung@...nel.org, ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com,
yao.jin@...ux.intel.com, ak@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] perf metricgroup: Support metric constraint
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 11:14:09AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
>
>
> On 2/20/2020 6:35 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 11:08:39AM -0800, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> >
> > SNIP
> >
> > > +static bool violate_nmi_constraint;
> > > +
> > > +static bool metricgroup__has_constraint(struct pmu_event *pe)
> > > +{
> > > + if (!pe->metric_constraint)
> > > + return false;
> > > +
> > > + if (!strcmp(pe->metric_constraint, "NO_NMI_WATCHDOG") &&
> > > + sysctl__nmi_watchdog_enabled()) {
> > > + pr_warning("Splitting metric group %s into standalone metrics.\n",
> > > + pe->metric_name);
> > > + violate_nmi_constraint = true;
> >
> > no static flags plz.. can't you just print that rest of the warning in here?
> >
>
> Because we only want to print the NMI watchdog warning once.
> If there are more than one metric groups with constraint, the warning may be
> printed several times. For example,
> $ perf stat -M Page_Walks_Utilization,Page_Walks_Utilization
> Splitting metric group Page_Walks_Utilization into standalone metrics.
> Try disabling the NMI watchdog to comply NO_NMI_WATCHDOG metric
> constraint:
> echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/nmi_watchdog
> perf stat ...
> echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/nmi_watchdog
> Splitting metric group Page_Walks_Utilization into standalone metrics.
> Try disabling the NMI watchdog to comply NO_NMI_WATCHDOG metric
> constraint:
> echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/nmi_watchdog
> perf stat ...
> echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/nmi_watchdog
> Is it OK?
>
> If it's OK, I think we can remove the flag.
we use the 'print once' static flags in functions,
so plz keep it inside like WARN_ONCE, or use it directly
jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists