[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMzpN2hL=K9GVg91esHQwm+3LdG00X164k4qFn=HOwSev56DUg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 08:41:23 -0500
From: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
To: Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] x86: Move 32-bit compat syscalls to common location
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 2:07 AM Dominik Brodowski
<linux@...inikbrodowski.net> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 12:09:31AM -0500, Brian Gerst wrote:
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile
> > @@ -57,6 +57,8 @@ obj-y += setup.o x86_init.o i8259.o irqinit.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL) += jump_label.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_IRQ_WORK) += irq_work.o
> > obj-y += probe_roms.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_X86_32) += sys_ia32.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION) += sys_ia32.o
>
> That doesn't look nicely...
Do you have a better suggestion? That's similar to how tls.o is
already handled.
--
Brian Gerst
Powered by blists - more mailing lists