[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdajokCMpJ98yfFp-s23jG96wO_N9R2ZXvXB+hU6XMs=ng@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 15:15:51 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: sunxi: Mask non-wakeup IRQs on suspend
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 10:33 PM Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org> wrote:
> The pin controller hardware does not distinguish IRQs intended for
> wakeup from other IRQs, so we must mask non-wakeup IRQs in software to
> prevent inadvertent wakeups. This is accomplished at the irqchip level
> via the IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND flag.
>
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>
Patch applied.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists