[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200221153539.GA23609@embeddedor>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 09:35:39 -0600
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Subject: [PATCH] iscsi_ibft: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array
member
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
---
drivers/firmware/iscsi_ibft.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/iscsi_ibft.c b/drivers/firmware/iscsi_ibft.c
index 96758b71a8db..7127a04bca19 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/iscsi_ibft.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/iscsi_ibft.c
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ struct ibft_control {
u16 tgt0_off;
u16 nic1_off;
u16 tgt1_off;
- u16 expansion[0];
+ u16 expansion[];
} __attribute__((__packed__));
struct ibft_initiator {
--
2.25.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists