[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200221154409.GP10516@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 16:44:09 +0100
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>,
Jasper Korten <jja2000@...il.com>,
David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>,
Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 12/17] cpuidle: Refactor and move out NVIDIA Tegra20
driver into drivers/cpuidle
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 02:51:29AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> The driver's code is refactored in a way that will make it easy to
> support Tegra30/114/124 SoCs by this unified driver later on. The
> current functionality is equal to the old Tegra20 driver, only the
> code's structure changed a tad. This is also a proper platform driver
> now.
>
> Acked-by: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-tegra/Makefile | 3 -
> arch/arm/mach-tegra/cpuidle-tegra20.c | 216 --------------------
> arch/arm/mach-tegra/cpuidle.c | 14 +-
> arch/arm/mach-tegra/cpuidle.h | 4 -
> drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm | 8 +
> drivers/cpuidle/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-tegra.c | 277 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Is it possible to use -M option here to make the review easier?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists