[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200221161445.GQ14879@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 17:14:45 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, joel@...lfernandes.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, gustavo@...eddedor.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, paulmck@...nel.org, josh@...htriplett.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, jiangshanlai@...il.com,
luto@...nel.org, tony.luck@...el.com, frederic@...nel.org,
dan.carpenter@...cle.com, mhiramat@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 03/27] x86/entry: Flip _TIF_SIGPENDING and
_TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME handling
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 02:34:19PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Make sure we run task_work before we hit any kind of userspace -- very
> much including signals.
>
> Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/entry/common.c | 8
> usr/src/linux-2.6/arch/x86/entry/common.c | 440 ------------------------------
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 444 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/arch/x86/entry/common.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/common.c
> @@ -155,16 +155,16 @@ static void exit_to_usermode_loop(struct
> if (cached_flags & _TIF_PATCH_PENDING)
> klp_update_patch_state(current);
>
> - /* deal with pending signal delivery */
> - if (cached_flags & _TIF_SIGPENDING)
> - do_signal(regs);
> -
> if (cached_flags & _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME) {
> clear_thread_flag(TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME);
> tracehook_notify_resume(regs);
> rseq_handle_notify_resume(NULL, regs);
> }
>
> + /* deal with pending signal delivery */
> + if (cached_flags & _TIF_SIGPENDING)
> + do_signal(regs);
> +
For giggles, I just found:
do_signal()
get_signal()
task_work_run()
Powered by blists - more mailing lists