[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200221162657.GG9496@magnolia>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 08:26:57 -0800
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, raven@...maw.net, mszeredi@...hat.com,
christian@...uner.io, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/19] ext4: Add example fsinfo information [ver #16]
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 02:43:05PM +0000, David Howells wrote:
> Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> > > + memcpy(ctx->buffer, es->s_volume_name, sizeof(es->s_volume_name));
> >
> > Shouldn't this be checking that ctx->buffer is large enough to hold
> > s_volume_name?
>
> Well, the buffer is guaranteed to be 4KiB in size.
Ah, ok.
> > > + return strlen(ctx->buffer);
> >
> > s_volume_name is /not/ a null-terminated string if the label is 16
> > characters long.
>
> And the buffer is precleared, so it's automatically NULL terminated.
<nod>
> > > +#define FSINFO_ATTR_EXT4_TIMESTAMPS 0x400 /* Ext4 superblock timestamps */
> >
> > I guess each filesystem gets ... 256 different attrs, and the third
> > nibble determines the namespace?
>
> No. Think of it as allocating namespace in 256-number blocks. That means
> there are 16 million of them. If a filesystem uses up an entire block, it can
> always allocate another one. I don't think it likely that we'll get
> sufficient filesystems to eat them all.
Ah. In that case I declare that we would like to reserve 0x5800-0x58FF
for XFS. :)
--D
> David
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists