[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e393431b-9e5e-9bcb-c03a-d40baeafa435@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 17:31:42 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
linmiaohe <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Cc: rkrcmar@...hat.com, vkuznets@...hat.com, wanpengli@...cent.com,
jmattson@...gle.com, joro@...tes.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, hpa@...or.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: X86: eliminate some meaningless code
On 21/02/20 16:23, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>
> I'm guessing no VMM actually uses this ioctl(), e.g. neither Qemu or CrosVM
> use it, which is why the broken behavior has gone unnoticed. Don't suppose
> you'd want to write a selftest to hammer KVM_{SET,GET}_CPUID2?
>
> int kvm_vcpu_ioctl_get_cpuid2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> struct kvm_cpuid2 *cpuid,
> struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 __user *entries)
> {
> if (cpuid->nent < vcpu->arch.cpuid_nent)
> return -E2BIG;
>
> if (copy_to_user(entries, &vcpu->arch.cpuid_entries,
> vcpu->arch.cpuid_nent * sizeof(struct kvm_cpuid_entry2)))
> return -EFAULT;
>
> cpuid->nent = vcpu->arch.cpuid_nent;
>
> return 0;
> }
I would just drop KVM_GET_CPUID2 altogether and see if someone complains.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists