[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d2b87102-fdf3-f22f-8477-5b2105d9583b@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 11:18:33 -0600
From: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
Chris Brandt <chris.brandt@...esas.com>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] gpio: of: Extract of_gpiochip_add_hog()
Hi Linus, Rob,
On 2/21/20 10:08 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 2:01 PM Geert Uytterhoeven
> <geert+renesas@...der.be> wrote:
>
>> Extract the code to add all GPIO hogs of a gpio-hog node into its own
>> function, so it can be reused.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
>> ---
>> v2:
>> - No changes.
>
> Patch applied with Frank's Review tag.
I created a devicetree unittest to show the problem that Geert's patches
fix.
I would prefer to have my unittest patch series applied somewhere,
immediately followed by Geert's patch series. This way, after
applying my series, a test fail is reported, then after Geert's
series is applied, the test fail becomes a test pass.
Can you coordinate with Rob to accept both series either via
your tree or Rob's tree?
-Frank
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists