[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cef77bcf-0921-a530-9745-7922e657b013@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 18:31:06 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] KVM: x86: Move "flush guest's TLB" logic to
separate kvm_x86_ops hook
On 21/02/20 14:52, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> index fbabb2f06273..72f7ca4baa6d 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> @@ -2675,7 +2675,7 @@ static void record_steal_time(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> trace_kvm_pv_tlb_flush(vcpu->vcpu_id,
>> st->preempted & KVM_VCPU_FLUSH_TLB);
>> if (xchg(&st->preempted, 0) & KVM_VCPU_FLUSH_TLB)
>> - kvm_vcpu_flush_tlb(vcpu, false);
>> + kvm_x86_ops->tlb_flush_guest(vcpu);
>>
>> vcpu->arch.st.preempted = 0;
> There is one additional place in hyperv.c where we do TLB flush on
> behalf of the guest, kvm_hv_flush_tlb(). Currently, it does
> KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH (resulting in kvm_x86_ops->tlb_flush()), do we need
> something like KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH_GUEST instead?
Yes, that would be better since INVEPT does not flush linear mappings.
So, when EPT and VPID is enabled, KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH would not flush the
guest's translations.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists