lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 21 Feb 2020 11:08:52 -0800
From:   Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
To:     "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>
Cc:     "iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Joerg Roedel" <joro@...tes.org>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
        "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
        Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
        jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 06/10] iommu/vt-d: Add svm/sva invalidate function

On Fri, 21 Feb 2020 06:34:35 +0000
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com> wrote:

> > From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 2:02 PM
> > Subject: [PATCH V9 06/10] iommu/vt-d: Add svm/sva invalidate
> > function
> > 
> > When Shared Virtual Address (SVA) is enabled for a guest OS via
> > vIOMMU, we need to provide invalidation support at IOMMU API and
> > driver level. This patch adds Intel VT-d specific function to
> > implement iommu passdown invalidate API for shared virtual address.
> > 
> > The use case is for supporting caching structure invalidation of
> > assigned SVM capable devices. Emulated IOMMU exposes queue
> > invalidation capability and passes down all descriptors from the
> > guest to the physical IOMMU.
> > 
> > The assumption is that guest to host device ID mapping should be
> > resolved prior to calling IOMMU driver. Based on the device handle,
> > host IOMMU driver can replace certain fields before submit to the
> > invalidation queue.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Liu, Yi L <yi.l.liu@...ux.intel.com>  
> 
> May be update my  email to Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@...el.com> :-)
> @linux.intel.com account no more work for me.  :-(
> 
Will do. Thanks.
> > ---
> >  drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 173
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 173 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> > b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c index 8a4136e805ac..b8aa6479b87f
> > 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> > @@ -5605,6 +5605,178 @@ static void
> > intel_iommu_aux_detach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> >  	aux_domain_remove_dev(to_dmar_domain(domain), dev);  }
> > 
> > +/*
> > + * 2D array for converting and sanitizing IOMMU generic TLB
> > granularity +to
> > + * VT-d granularity. Invalidation is typically included in the
> > unmap +operation
> > + * as a result of DMA or VFIO unmap. However, for assigned device
> > where +guest
> > + * could own the first level page tables without being shadowed by
> > +QEMU. In
> > + * this case there is no pass down unmap to the host IOMMU as a
> > result +of unmap
> > + * in the guest. Only invalidations are trapped and passed down.
> > + * In all cases, only first level TLB invalidation (request with
> > PASID) +can be
> > + * passed down, therefore we do not include IOTLB granularity for
> > +request
> > + * without PASID (second level).
> > + *
> > + * For an example, to find the VT-d granularity encoding for IOTLB
> > + * type and page selective granularity within PASID:
> > + * X: indexed by iommu cache type
> > + * Y: indexed by enum iommu_inv_granularity
> > + * [IOMMU_CACHE_INV_TYPE_IOTLB][IOMMU_INV_GRANU_ADDR]
> > + *
> > + * Granu_map array indicates validity of the table. 1: valid, 0:
> > +invalid
> > + *
> > + */
> > +const static int
> > inv_type_granu_map[IOMMU_CACHE_INV_TYPE_NR][IOMMU_INV_GRANU_N
> > R] = {
> > +	/* PASID based IOTLB, support PASID selective and page
> > selective */
> > +	{0, 1, 1},
> > +	/* PASID based dev TLBs, only support all PASIDs or single
> > PASID */
> > +	{1, 1, 0},
> > +	/* PASID cache */
> > +	{1, 1, 0}
> > +};
> > +
> > +const static u64
> > inv_type_granu_table[IOMMU_CACHE_INV_TYPE_NR][IOMMU_INV_GRANU_
> > NR] = {
> > +	/* PASID based IOTLB */
> > +	{0, QI_GRAN_NONG_PASID, QI_GRAN_PSI_PASID},
> > +	/* PASID based dev TLBs */
> > +	{QI_DEV_IOTLB_GRAN_ALL, QI_DEV_IOTLB_GRAN_PASID_SEL, 0},
> > +	/* PASID cache */
> > +	{QI_PC_ALL_PASIDS, QI_PC_PASID_SEL, 0}, };
> > +
> > +static inline int to_vtd_granularity(int type, int granu, u64
> > +*vtd_granu) {
> > +	if (type >= IOMMU_CACHE_INV_TYPE_NR || granu >=
> > IOMMU_INV_GRANU_NR ||
> > +		!inv_type_granu_map[type][granu])
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	*vtd_granu = inv_type_granu_table[type][granu];
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline u64 to_vtd_size(u64 granu_size, u64 nr_granules) {
> > +	u64 nr_pages = (granu_size * nr_granules) >>
> > VTD_PAGE_SHIFT; +
> > +	/* VT-d size is encoded as 2^size of 4K pages, 0 for 4k, 9
> > for 2MB, etc.
> > +	 * IOMMU cache invalidate API passes granu_size in bytes,
> > and number of
> > +	 * granu size in contiguous memory.
> > +	 */
> > +	return order_base_2(nr_pages);
> > +}
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_SVM
> > +static int intel_iommu_sva_invalidate(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> > +		struct device *dev, struct
> > iommu_cache_invalidate_info *inv_info) {
> > +	struct dmar_domain *dmar_domain = to_dmar_domain(domain);
> > +	struct device_domain_info *info;
> > +	struct intel_iommu *iommu;
> > +	unsigned long flags;
> > +	int cache_type;
> > +	u8 bus, devfn;
> > +	u16 did, sid;
> > +	int ret = 0;
> > +	u64 size;
> > +
> > +	if (!inv_info || !dmar_domain ||
> > +		inv_info->version !=
> > IOMMU_CACHE_INVALIDATE_INFO_VERSION_1)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	if (!dev || !dev_is_pci(dev))
> > +		return -ENODEV;
> > +
> > +	iommu = device_to_iommu(dev, &bus, &devfn);
> > +	if (!iommu)
> > +		return -ENODEV;
> > +
> > +	spin_lock_irqsave(&device_domain_lock, flags);
> > +	spin_lock(&iommu->lock);
> > +	info = iommu_support_dev_iotlb(dmar_domain, iommu, bus,
> > devfn);
> > +	if (!info) {
> > +		ret = -EINVAL;
> > +		goto out_unlock;
> > +	}
> > +	did = dmar_domain->iommu_did[iommu->seq_id];
> > +	sid = PCI_DEVID(bus, devfn);
> > +	size = to_vtd_size(inv_info->addr_info.granule_size,
> > +inv_info->addr_info.nb_granules);  
> 
> Here I have a concern that we always try to get size via
> to_vtd_size(). But the inv_info->addr_info.granule_size and
> inv_info->addr_info.nb_granules may be meaningless if the
> invalidation is not a page selective one. May we add a check here on
> the invalidation granularity. :-)
> 
Good point. We should add a check:
if (inv_info->granularity != IOMMU_INV_GRANU_PASID)
> > +	for_each_set_bit(cache_type, (unsigned long
> > *)&inv_info->cache, IOMMU_CACHE_INV_TYPE_NR) {
> > +		u64 granu = 0;
> > +		u64 pasid = 0;
> > +
> > +		ret = to_vtd_granularity(cache_type,
> > inv_info->granularity, &granu);
> > +		if (ret) {
> > +			pr_err("Invalid cache type and granu
> > combination %d/%d\n", cache_type,
> > +				inv_info->granularity);
> > +			break;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		/* PASID is stored in different locations based on
> > granularity */
> > +		if (inv_info->granularity == IOMMU_INV_GRANU_PASID)
> > +			pasid = inv_info->pasid_info.pasid;
> > +		else if (inv_info->granularity ==
> > IOMMU_INV_GRANU_ADDR)
> > +			pasid = inv_info->addr_info.pasid;
> > +		else {
> > +			pr_err("Cannot find PASID for given cache
> > type and granularity\n");
> > +			break;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		switch (BIT(cache_type)) {
> > +		case IOMMU_CACHE_INV_TYPE_IOTLB:
> > +			if (size && (inv_info->addr_info.addr &
> > ((BIT(VTD_PAGE_SHIFT + size)) - 1))) {  
> 
> May  need to update acoordingly if the above comment was accepted.
> :-)
> 
Yes, need to add a check here also. Otherwise, size can be out of range
for PASID selective invalidation and cause functional problems.

Thanks!

Jacob

> Regards,
> Yi Liu
> 

[Jacob Pan]

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ