linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND v6 00/16] mm: Page fault enhancements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200221201108.GF37727@xz-x1>
Date:   Fri, 21 Feb 2020 15:11:08 -0500
From:   Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        Martin Cracauer <cracauer@...s.org>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Bobby Powers <bobbypowers@...il.com>,
        Maya Gokhale <gokhale2@...l.gov>,
        Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Marty McFadden <mcfadden8@...l.gov>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        Brian Geffon <bgeffon@...gle.com>,
        Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@...tuozzo.com>,
        Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...tuozzo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v6 00/16] mm: Page fault enhancements

On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 11:32:36AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 7:54 AM Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > This is v6 of the series.  It is majorly a rebase to 5.6-rc2, nothing
> > else to be expected (plus some tests after the rebase).  Instead of
> > rewrite the cover letter I decided to use what we have for v5.
> 
> I continue to think this is the right thing to do, and the series
> looks good to me.
> 
> I'd love for it to get more testing, but realistically I suspect that
> being in linux-next will be the right thing.
> 
> I've been assuming this will go through Andrew. He's not explicitly
> cc'd, though (although maybe he does read all of linux-mm and has seen
> this several times as a result).

I'm very sorry for missing that.  I should have cced Andrew for every
mm patches.  Hope that's not a problem for this series.  I'll remember
to do that from now on.  Thanks!

-- 
Peter Xu