linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] docs: remove MPX from the x86 toc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200221225642.006495c9@heffalump.sk2.org>
Date:   Fri, 21 Feb 2020 22:56:42 +0100
From:   Stephen Kitt <steve@....org>
To:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: remove MPX from the x86 toc

On Fri, 21 Feb 2020 13:03:46 -0800, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com> wrote:
> On 2/21/20 12:57 PM, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > MPX was removed in commit 45fc24e89b7c ("x86/mpx: remove MPX from
> > arch/x86"), this removes the corresponding entry in the x86 toc.
> > 
> > This was suggested by a Sphinx warning.  
> 
> Pretty obvious miss on my part.  Thanks for finding and fixing it.
> 
> It might be nice to add:
> 
> Fixes: 45fc24e89b7cc ("x86/mpx: remove MPX from arch/x86")

Ah yes, it would be. What’s the etiquette here? Should I respin, or can
whoever merges this (Jon?) add this to the commit message?

> In any case:
> 
> Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>

Thanks!

Stephen

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped