[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202002221501.6Iz5kP2U%lkp@intel.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2020 15:27:04 +0800
From: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [rcu:rcu/next 110/168] kernel/rcu/tree.c:3401:2: error: implicit
declaration of function 'ASSERT_EXCLUSIVE_WRITER'
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git rcu/next
head: 8aa63de65a79bd8c5c1c2b19452e35f58b043ac7
commit: e70e4b3e69ce8d3fdfc1f4bfe6ed27187e1a9016 [110/168] rcu: Mark rcu_state.ncpus to detect concurrent writes
config: arc-defconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: arc-elf-gcc (GCC) 9.2.0
reproduce:
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
git checkout e70e4b3e69ce8d3fdfc1f4bfe6ed27187e1a9016
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
GCC_VERSION=9.2.0 make.cross ARCH=arc
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Note: the rcu/rcu/next HEAD 8aa63de65a79bd8c5c1c2b19452e35f58b043ac7 builds fine.
It only hurts bisectibility.
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
kernel/rcu/tree.c: In function 'rcu_cpu_starting':
>> kernel/rcu/tree.c:3401:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'ASSERT_EXCLUSIVE_WRITER' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
3401 | ASSERT_EXCLUSIVE_WRITER(rcu_state.ncpus);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +/ASSERT_EXCLUSIVE_WRITER +3401 kernel/rcu/tree.c
3364
3365 /*
3366 * Mark the specified CPU as being online so that subsequent grace periods
3367 * (both expedited and normal) will wait on it. Note that this means that
3368 * incoming CPUs are not allowed to use RCU read-side critical sections
3369 * until this function is called. Failing to observe this restriction
3370 * will result in lockdep splats.
3371 *
3372 * Note that this function is special in that it is invoked directly
3373 * from the incoming CPU rather than from the cpuhp_step mechanism.
3374 * This is because this function must be invoked at a precise location.
3375 */
3376 void rcu_cpu_starting(unsigned int cpu)
3377 {
3378 unsigned long flags;
3379 unsigned long mask;
3380 int nbits;
3381 unsigned long oldmask;
3382 struct rcu_data *rdp;
3383 struct rcu_node *rnp;
3384
3385 if (per_cpu(rcu_cpu_started, cpu))
3386 return;
3387
3388 per_cpu(rcu_cpu_started, cpu) = 1;
3389
3390 rdp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, cpu);
3391 rnp = rdp->mynode;
3392 mask = rdp->grpmask;
3393 raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
3394 WRITE_ONCE(rnp->qsmaskinitnext, rnp->qsmaskinitnext | mask);
3395 oldmask = rnp->expmaskinitnext;
3396 rnp->expmaskinitnext |= mask;
3397 oldmask ^= rnp->expmaskinitnext;
3398 nbits = bitmap_weight(&oldmask, BITS_PER_LONG);
3399 /* Allow lockless access for expedited grace periods. */
3400 smp_store_release(&rcu_state.ncpus, rcu_state.ncpus + nbits); /* ^^^ */
> 3401 ASSERT_EXCLUSIVE_WRITER(rcu_state.ncpus);
3402 rcu_gpnum_ovf(rnp, rdp); /* Offline-induced counter wrap? */
3403 rdp->rcu_onl_gp_seq = READ_ONCE(rcu_state.gp_seq);
3404 rdp->rcu_onl_gp_flags = READ_ONCE(rcu_state.gp_flags);
3405 if (rnp->qsmask & mask) { /* RCU waiting on incoming CPU? */
3406 rcu_disable_urgency_upon_qs(rdp);
3407 /* Report QS -after- changing ->qsmaskinitnext! */
3408 rcu_report_qs_rnp(mask, rnp, rnp->gp_seq, flags);
3409 } else {
3410 raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
3411 }
3412 smp_mb(); /* Ensure RCU read-side usage follows above initialization. */
3413 }
3414
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Download attachment ".config.gz" of type "application/gzip" (9224 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists