[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200222114136.595-1-michael@walle.cc>
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2020 12:41:36 +0100
From: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
To: olteanv@...il.com
Cc: andrew@...n.ch, davem@...emloft.net, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
f.fainelli@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
shawnguo@...nel.org, vivien.didelot@...il.com,
Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next/devicetree 5/5] arm64: dts: fsl: ls1028a: enable switch PHYs on RDB
Hi,
> Link the switch PHY nodes to the central MDIO controller PCIe endpoint
> node on LS1028A (implemented as PF3) so that PHYs are accessible via
> MDIO.
>
> Enable SGMII AN on the Felix PCS by telling PHYLINK that the VSC8514
> quad PHY is capable of in-band-status.
>
> The PHYs are used in poll mode due to an issue with the interrupt line
> on current revisions of the LS1028A-RDB board.
>
> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Marginean <alexandru.marginean@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> None.
>
> .../boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a-rdb.dts | 51 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a-rdb.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a-rdb.dts
> index afb55653850d..9353c00e46a7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a-rdb.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a-rdb.dts
> @@ -194,6 +194,57 @@
> status = "disabled";
> };
>
> +&enetc_mdio_pf3 {
> + /* VSC8514 QSGMII quad PHY */
> + qsgmii_phy0: ethernet-phy@10 {
> + reg = <0x10>;
> + };
> +
> + qsgmii_phy1: ethernet-phy@11 {
> + reg = <0x11>;
> + };
> +
> + qsgmii_phy2: ethernet-phy@12 {
> + reg = <0x12>;
> + };
> +
> + qsgmii_phy3: ethernet-phy@13 {
> + reg = <0x13>;
> + };
> +};
> +
> +&mscc_felix_port0 {
> + status = "okay";
status should be the last property, correct?
-michael
> + label = "swp0";
> + managed = "in-band-status";
> + phy-handle = <&qsgmii_phy0>;
> + phy-mode = "qsgmii";
> +};
> +
> +&mscc_felix_port1 {
> + status = "okay";
> + label = "swp1";
> + managed = "in-band-status";
> + phy-handle = <&qsgmii_phy1>;
> + phy-mode = "qsgmii";
> +};
> +
> +&mscc_felix_port2 {
> + status = "okay";
> + label = "swp2";
> + managed = "in-band-status";
> + phy-handle = <&qsgmii_phy2>;
> + phy-mode = "qsgmii";
> +};
> +
> +&mscc_felix_port3 {
> + status = "okay";
> + label = "swp3";
> + managed = "in-band-status";
> + phy-handle = <&qsgmii_phy3>;
> + phy-mode = "qsgmii";
> +};
> +
> &sai4 {
> status = "okay";
> };
> --
> 2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists