linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] arm64 fixes for -rc3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wjyde11qnRQAMgibwcvNCd0bQX5chFgdu58tP0NPhnk_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 21 Feb 2020 16:07:56 -0800
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc:     Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] arm64 fixes for -rc3

On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 8:01 AM Will Deacon <will@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> That said, this is core code and I know you'd prefer to limit the change
> to brk(), so the patch is sitting on top of the branch in case you prefer
> not to include it. If you decide to tweak it manually, please can you
> update the docs at the same time?

I've taken it as-is, since I don't think any of the solutions were wrong.

The mremap() case looks odd, with the _old_ address untagged, but the
new one not. I see the logic, but because it looks so odd I think it
might be worth a comment.

Not a big deal, and more of a "if you get around to it later" note.

            Linus