linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] lib: iov_iter.c: fix a possible calculation error on remaining bytes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1582463706.19053.32.camel@mtkswgap22>
Date:   Sun, 23 Feb 2020 21:15:06 +0800
From:   Macpaul Lin <macpaul.lin@...iatek.com>
To:     Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
CC:     Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Shen Jing <jingx.shen@...el.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@...labora.com>,
        Vincent Pelletier <plr.vincent@...il.com>,
        Jerry Zhang <zhangjerry@...gle.com>,
        <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Mediatek WSD Upstream <wsd_upstream@...iatek.com>,
        CC Hwang <cc.hwang@...iatek.com>,
        Loda Chou <loda.chou@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib: iov_iter.c: fix a possible calculation error on
 remaining bytes

On Tue, 2020-02-18 at 12:41 +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 03:41:12PM +0800, Macpaul Lin wrote:
> > This issue was found when adbd trying to open functionfs with AIO mode.
> > Usually, we need to set "setprop sys.usb.ffs.aio_compat 0" to enable
> > adbd with AIO mode on Android.
> > 
> > When adbd is opening functionfs, it will try to read 24 bytes at the
> > fisrt read I/O control. If this reading has been failed, adbd will
> > try to send FUNCTIONFS_CLEAR_HALT to functionfs. When adbd is in AIO
> > mode, functionfs will be acted with asyncronized I/O path. After the
> > successful read transfer has been completed by gadget hardware, the
> > following series of functions will be called.
> >   ffs_epfile_async_io_complete() -> ffs_user_copy_worker() ->
> >     copy_to_iter() -> _copy_to_iter() -> copyout() ->
> >     iterate_and_advance() -> iterate_iovec()
> > 
> > Adding debug trace to these functions, it has been found that in
> > iterate_iovec(), the calculation result of n will be turned into zero.
> >    n = wanted - n; /* 0 == n = 24 - 24; */
> > Which causes copyout() won't copy data to userspace since the length
> > to be copied "v.iov_len" will be zero, which isn't correct. This also
> > leads ffs_copy_to_iter() always return -EFAULT. Finally adbd cannot
> > open functionfs and send FUNCTIONFS_CLEAR_HALT.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Macpaul Lin <macpaul.lin@...iatek.com>
> > ---
> >  lib/iov_iter.c | 3 ++-
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/lib/iov_iter.c b/lib/iov_iter.c
> > index fb29c02c6a3c..f9334144e259 100644
> > --- a/lib/iov_iter.c
> > +++ b/lib/iov_iter.c
> > @@ -36,7 +36,8 @@
> >  		skip = __v.iov_len;			\
> >  		n -= __v.iov_len;			\
> >  	}						\
> > -	n = wanted - n;					\
> > +	if (n != wanted)				\
> > +		n = wanted - n;				\
> >  }
> 
> 	First of all, nothing in that line can possibly *cause*
> copyout() to do anything - it's after the calls of step.  What's
> more, this changes behaviour only when wanted would've been equal to
> n, doesn't it?  Which translates into "no decrements of n have
> happened at all", i.e. "nothing has been copied".  IOW, it's
> a consequence of no copyout, not the cause of such.  You can
> make copy_to_iter() lie and pretend if has copied everything
> when it has copied nothing, but that won't change the underlying
> bug.
> 
> 	So I'm afraid your debugging is not finished - you
> still need to find out what causes the copyout failures and/or
> BS iov_iter padded by caller.

Thanks for your explanation. After these days, I've found this issue
only happened on arm 64-bit system, while arm 32-bit system works well.
After more debugging, it looks like arm 64 tagged ABI related issue.
I've update a new patch here: 
    usb: gadget: f_fs: try to fix AIO issue under ARM 64 bit TAGGED mode
    https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/23/16.

Thanks.
Macpaul Lin.