linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/344] 5.4.22-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200223172604.GC349989@kroah.com>
Date:   Sun, 23 Feb 2020 18:26:04 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>
Cc:     Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
        "tony@...mide.com" <tony@...mide.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, patches@...nelci.org,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        linux- stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-tegra <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/344] 5.4.22-stable review

On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 01:57:20PM +0200, Tero Kristo wrote:
> On 21/02/2020 13:17, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > On Fri, 21 Feb 2020 at 15:34, Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On 21/02/2020 07:36, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.22 release.
> > > > There are 344 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > let me know.
> > > > 
> > > > Responses should be made by Sun, 23 Feb 2020 07:19:49 +0000.
> > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > > 
> > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > >        https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.22-rc1.gz
> > > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > >        git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> > > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > > > 
> > > > thanks,
> > > > 
> > > > greg k-h
> > > > 
> > > > -------------
> > > > Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
> > > 
> > > ...
> > > 
> > > > Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>
> > > >      ARM: OMAP2+: pdata-quirks: add PRM data for reset support
> > > 
> > > 
> > > The above commit is generating the following build error on ARM systems ...
> > > 
> > > dvs/git/dirty/git-master_l4t-upstream/kernel/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pdata-quirks.c:27:10: fatal error: linux/platform_data/ti-prm.h: No such file or directory
> > >   #include <linux/platform_data/ti-prm.h>
> > >            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > 
> > build error:
> > 
> > ../arch/arm/mach-omap2/pdata-quirks.c:27:10: fatal error:
> > linux/platform_data/ti-prm.h: No such file or directory
> >     27 | #include <linux/platform_data/ti-prm.h>
> >        |          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > compilation terminated.
> > make[2]: *** [../scripts/Makefile.build:265:
> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/pdata-quirks.o] Error 1
> > 
> > With these below three patches, it applies cleanly and builds.
> > But I'm not sure these are not expected to get into stable rc 5.4 branch.
> 
> Yeah, without PRM driver the pdata-quirk patch should not have been picked
> up. I wonder why it ended up in stable. Tony, any ideas?

I've dropped the offending patch now, sorry about that.

greg k-h