linux-kernel - Open Source Security infringement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6f3d44e4dbccccf4f0d69314a948acb8@firemail.cc>
Date:   Sun, 23 Feb 2020 22:56:23 +0000
From:   raebae@...email.cc
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Open Source Security infringement

Disregarding the fact that MikeeUSA is a subhuman pedophile, is there a 
valid legal argument for suing Open Source Security for infringement? If 
yes, then why is there no interest to enforce the kernel's license? If 
not, can someone please explain once and for all why?