[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87v9nvn98s.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 19:14:11 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Sebastian Sewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch V3 10/22] bpf: Provide bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu() helper
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> writes:
> + * preempt_disable/enable(), i.e. it disables also preemption.
> + */
> +static inline u32 bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu(const struct bpf_prog *prog,
> + void *ctx)
I'm a moron. Let me resend this one.
> +{
> + u32 ret;
> +
> + migrate_disable();
> + ret = __BPF_PROG_RUN(prog, ctx, bpf_dispatcher_nopfunc);
> + migrate_enable();
> + return ret;
> +}
>
> #define BPF_SKB_CB_LEN QDISC_CB_PRIV_LEN
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists