lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200224182201.GA22668@araj-mobl1.jf.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 24 Feb 2020 10:22:02 -0800
From:   "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@...aro.org>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        jonathan.cameron@...wei.com, dave.jiang@...el.com,
        grant.likely@....com, jean-philippe <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
        Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
        ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org, francois.ozog@...aro.org,
        kenneth-lee-2012@...mail.com, Wangzhou <wangzhou1@...ilicon.com>,
        "haojian . zhuang" <haojian.zhuang@...aro.org>,
        guodong.xu@...aro.org, linux-accelerators@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        Kenneth Lee <liguozhu@...ilicon.com>,
        Zaibo Xu <xuzaibo@...wei.com>, Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 2/4] uacce: add uacce driver

Hi Kenneth,

sorry for waking up late on this patchset.


On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:12:46PM +0800, Zhangfei Gao wrote:
[... trimmed]

> +
> +static int uacce_fops_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
> +{
> +	struct uacce_mm *uacce_mm = NULL;
> +	struct uacce_device *uacce;
> +	struct uacce_queue *q;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	uacce = xa_load(&uacce_xa, iminor(inode));
> +	if (!uacce)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	q = kzalloc(sizeof(struct uacce_queue), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!q)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&uacce->mm_lock);
> +	uacce_mm = uacce_mm_get(uacce, q, current->mm);

I think having this at open time is a bit unnatural. Since when a process
does fork, we do not inherit the PASID. Although it inherits the fd
but cannot use the mmaped address in the child.

If you move this to the mmap time, its more natural. The child could
do a mmap() get a new PASID + mmio space to work with the hardware.


> +	mutex_unlock(&uacce->mm_lock);
> +	if (!uacce_mm) {
> +		ret = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto out_with_mem;
> +	}
> +

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ