[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <67855a10-f7cb-b6b3-7b9f-d9c9baa5f105@i2se.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 20:25:46 +0100
From: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>,
Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
Cc: Tim Gover <tim.gover@...pberrypi.com>,
Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Phil Elwell <phil@...pberrypi.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/89] clk: bcm: rpi: Add clock id to data
Hi Maxime,
Am 24.02.20 um 10:06 schrieb Maxime Ripard:
> The driver has really only supported one clock so far and has hardcoded the
> ID used in communications with the firmware in all the functions
> implementing the clock framework hooks. Let's store that in the clock data
> structure so that we can support more clocks later on.
thank you for this series. I looked through it but i couldn't find an
explanation why we need to expose firmware clocks via DT instead of
extending clk-bcm2835. The whole pllb / clk-raspberrypi stuff was an
exception to get cpufreq working. I prefer to keep it an exception.
Regards
Stefan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists