[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200224213139.GO11457@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 22:31:39 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, gustavo@...eddedor.com,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, paulmck@...nel.org,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/27] x86: Replace ist_enter() with nmi_enter()
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 11:47:54AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Feb 2020 17:34:09 +0100
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> > Looking at nmi_enter(), that leaves trace_hardirq_enter(), since we know
> > we marked rcu_nmi_enter() as NOKPROBES, per the patches elsewhere in
> > this series.
>
> Maybe this was addressed already in the series, but I'm just looking at
> Linus's master branch we have:
>
> #define nmi_enter() \
> do { \
> arch_nmi_enter(); \
> printk_nmi_enter(); \
> lockdep_off(); \
> ftrace_nmi_enter(); \
> BUG_ON(in_nmi()); \
> preempt_count_add(NMI_OFFSET + HARDIRQ_OFFSET); \
> rcu_nmi_enter(); \
> trace_hardirq_enter(); \
> } while (0)
>
>
> Just want to confirm that printk_nmi_enter(), lockdep_off(),
> and ftrace_nmi_enter() are all marked fully with NOKPROBE.
*sigh*, right you are, I only looked at notrace, not nokprobe.
In particular the ftrace one is a bit off a mess, let me sort through
that.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists