[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87eeujoekx.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 22:33:34 +0100
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 39/61] KVM: SVM: Convert feature updates from CPUID to KVM cpu caps
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com> writes:
> Use the recently introduced KVM CPU caps to propagate SVM-only (kernel)
> settings to supported CPUID flags.
>
> Note, setting a flag based on a *different* feature is effectively
> emulation, and so must be done at runtime via ->set_supported_cpuid().
>
> Opportunistically add a technically unnecessary break and fix an
> indentation issue in svm_set_supported_cpuid().
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> index 630520f8adfa..f98a192459f7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> @@ -1350,6 +1350,25 @@ static __init void svm_adjust_mmio_mask(void)
> kvm_mmu_set_mmio_spte_mask(mask, mask, PT_WRITABLE_MASK | PT_USER_MASK);
> }
>
Can we probably add the comment about what can be done here and what
needs to go to svm_set_supported_cpuid()? (The one about 'emulation'
from your commit message would do).
> +static __init void svm_set_cpu_caps(void)
> +{
> + /* CPUID 0x1 */
> + if (avic)
> + kvm_cpu_cap_clear(X86_FEATURE_X2APIC);
> +
> + /* CPUID 0x80000001 */
> + if (nested)
> + kvm_cpu_cap_set(X86_FEATURE_SVM);
> +
> + /* CPUID 0x8000000A */
> + /* Support next_rip if host supports it */
> + if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_NRIPS))
> + kvm_cpu_cap_set(X86_FEATURE_NRIPS);
Unrelated to your patch but the way we handle 'nrips' is a bit weird: we
can disable it with 'nrips' module parameter but L1 hypervisor will get
it unconditionally.
Also, what about all the rest of 0x8000000A.EDX features? Nested SVM
would appreciate some love...
> +
> + if (npt_enabled)
> + kvm_cpu_cap_set(X86_FEATURE_NPT);
> +}
> +
> static __init int svm_hardware_setup(void)
> {
> int cpu;
> @@ -1462,6 +1481,8 @@ static __init int svm_hardware_setup(void)
> pr_info("Virtual GIF supported\n");
> }
>
> + svm_set_cpu_caps();
> +
> return 0;
>
> err:
> @@ -6033,17 +6054,9 @@ static void svm_cpuid_update(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> static void svm_set_supported_cpuid(struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry)
> {
> switch (entry->function) {
> - case 0x1:
> - if (avic)
> - cpuid_entry_clear(entry, X86_FEATURE_X2APIC);
> - break;
> - case 0x80000001:
> - if (nested)
> - cpuid_entry_set(entry, X86_FEATURE_SVM);
> - break;
> case 0x80000008:
> if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_LS_CFG_SSBD) ||
> - boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AMD_SSBD))
> + boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AMD_SSBD))
> cpuid_entry_set(entry, X86_FEATURE_VIRT_SSBD);
> break;
> case 0x8000000A:
> @@ -6053,14 +6066,7 @@ static void svm_set_supported_cpuid(struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry)
> entry->ecx = 0; /* Reserved */
> entry->edx = 0; /* Per default do not support any
> additional features */
> -
> - /* Support next_rip if host supports it */
> - if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_NRIPS))
> - cpuid_entry_set(entry, X86_FEATURE_NRIPS);
> -
> - /* Support NPT for the guest if enabled */
> - if (npt_enabled)
> - cpuid_entry_set(entry, X86_FEATURE_NPT);
> + break;
> }
> }
Reviewed-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
--
Vitaly
Powered by blists - more mailing lists