linux-kernel - [PATCH 09/89] clk: bcm: rpi: Use clk_hw_register for pllb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1c47c839fda93460994d37b4c851d805a3282d5f.1582533919.git-series.maxime@cerno.tech>
Date:   Mon, 24 Feb 2020 10:06:11 +0100
From:   Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
To:     Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>,
        Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
Cc:     dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com>,
        Tim Gover <tim.gover@...pberrypi.com>,
        Phil Elwell <phil@...pberrypi.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 09/89] clk: bcm: rpi: Use clk_hw_register for pllb_arm

The pllb_arm clock is defined as a fixed factor clock with the pllb clock
as a parent. However, all its configuration is entirely static, and thus we
don't really need to call clk_hw_register_fixed_factor but can simply call
clk_hw_register with a static clk_fixed_factor structure.

Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
---
 drivers/clk/bcm/clk-raspberrypi.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-raspberrypi.c b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-raspberrypi.c
index 64fd91b5ffe9..48cffa44db64 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-raspberrypi.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-raspberrypi.c
@@ -225,16 +225,28 @@ static int raspberrypi_register_pllb(struct raspberrypi_clk *rpi)
 	return devm_clk_hw_register(rpi->dev, &rpi->pllb);
 }
 
+static struct clk_fixed_factor raspberrypi_clk_pllb_arm = {
+	.mult = 1,
+	.div = 2,
+	.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data) {
+		.name		= "pllb_arm",
+		.parent_names	= (const char *[]){ "pllb" },
+		.num_parents	= 1,
+		.ops		= &clk_fixed_factor_ops,
+		.flags		= CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE,
+	},
+};
+
 static int raspberrypi_register_pllb_arm(struct raspberrypi_clk *rpi)
 {
-	rpi->pllb_arm = clk_hw_register_fixed_factor(rpi->dev,
-				"pllb_arm", "pllb",
-				CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE,
-				1, 2);
-	if (IS_ERR(rpi->pllb_arm)) {
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = clk_hw_register(rpi->dev, &raspberrypi_clk_pllb_arm.hw);
+	if (ret) {
 		dev_err(rpi->dev, "Failed to initialize pllb_arm\n");
-		return PTR_ERR(rpi->pllb_arm);
+		return ret;
 	}
+	rpi->pllb_arm = &raspberrypi_clk_pllb_arm.hw;
 
 	rpi->pllb_arm_lookup = clkdev_hw_create(rpi->pllb_arm, NULL, "cpu0");
 	if (!rpi->pllb_arm_lookup) {
-- 
git-series 0.9.1