lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200224093215.GC14897@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Mon, 24 Feb 2020 10:32:15 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     qiwuchen55@...il.com
Cc:     mingo@...hat.com, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
        vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, chenqiwu <chenqiwu@...omi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/pelt: use shift operation instead of division
 operation

On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 11:30:55AM +0800, qiwuchen55@...il.com wrote:
> From: chenqiwu <chenqiwu@...omi.com>
> 
> Use shift operation to calculate the periods instead of division,
> since shift operation is more efficient than division operation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: chenqiwu <chenqiwu@...omi.com>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/pelt.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/pelt.c b/kernel/sched/pelt.c
> index bd006b7..ac79f8e 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/pelt.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/pelt.c
> @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ static u32 __accumulate_pelt_segments(u64 periods, u32 d1, u32 d3)
>  	u64 periods;
>  
>  	delta += sa->period_contrib;
> -	periods = delta / 1024; /* A period is 1024us (~1ms) */
> +	periods = delta >> 10; /* A period is 1024us (~1ms) */

Find me a compiler that stupid.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ