[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200224093215.GC14897@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 10:32:15 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: qiwuchen55@...il.com
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, chenqiwu <chenqiwu@...omi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/pelt: use shift operation instead of division
operation
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 11:30:55AM +0800, qiwuchen55@...il.com wrote:
> From: chenqiwu <chenqiwu@...omi.com>
>
> Use shift operation to calculate the periods instead of division,
> since shift operation is more efficient than division operation.
>
> Signed-off-by: chenqiwu <chenqiwu@...omi.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/pelt.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/pelt.c b/kernel/sched/pelt.c
> index bd006b7..ac79f8e 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/pelt.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/pelt.c
> @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ static u32 __accumulate_pelt_segments(u64 periods, u32 d1, u32 d3)
> u64 periods;
>
> delta += sa->period_contrib;
> - periods = delta / 1024; /* A period is 1024us (~1ms) */
> + periods = delta >> 10; /* A period is 1024us (~1ms) */
Find me a compiler that stupid.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists