lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200224113217.GA11120@e121166-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date:   Mon, 24 Feb 2020 11:32:25 +0000
From:   Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
To:     Vidya Sagar <vidyas@...dia.com>
Cc:     jingoohan1@...il.com, gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com,
        andrew.murray@....com, bhelgaas@...gle.com, kishon@...com,
        thierry.reding@...il.com, Jisheng.Zhang@...aptics.com,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kthota@...dia.com,
        mmaddireddy@...dia.com, sagar.tv@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 4/5] PCI: dwc: Add API to notify core initialization
 completion

On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 05:40:35PM +0530, Vidya Sagar wrote:
> Add a new API dw_pcie_ep_init_notify() to let platform drivers
> call it when the core is available for initialization.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@...dia.com>
> Acked-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
> ---
> V3:
> * Added Acked-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
> 
> V2:
> * None
> 
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c | 7 +++++++
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h    | 5 +++++
>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> index 84a102df9f62..dfbb806c25bf 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,13 @@ void dw_pcie_ep_linkup(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
>  	pci_epc_linkup(epc);
>  }
>  
> +void dw_pcie_ep_init_notify(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
> +{
> +	struct pci_epc *epc = ep->epc;
> +
> +	pci_epc_init_notify(epc);
> +}

Do we really need this wrapper ? I would drop this code and I would
appreciate if you could post tegra changes benefiting from this
series, at the moment I don't see any user of this newly added
infrastructure.

Thanks,
Lorenzo

>  static void __dw_pcie_ep_reset_bar(struct dw_pcie *pci, enum pci_barno bar,
>  				   int flags)
>  {
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> index b67b7f756bc2..aa98fbd50807 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> @@ -412,6 +412,7 @@ static inline int dw_pcie_allocate_domains(struct pcie_port *pp)
>  void dw_pcie_ep_linkup(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep);
>  int dw_pcie_ep_init(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep);
>  int dw_pcie_ep_init_complete(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep);
> +void dw_pcie_ep_init_notify(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep);
>  void dw_pcie_ep_exit(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep);
>  int dw_pcie_ep_raise_legacy_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no);
>  int dw_pcie_ep_raise_msi_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no,
> @@ -434,6 +435,10 @@ static inline int dw_pcie_ep_init_complete(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static inline void dw_pcie_ep_init_notify(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
> +{
> +}
> +
>  static inline void dw_pcie_ep_exit(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
>  {
>  }
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ