linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RT 20/25] kmemleak: Cosmetic changes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 24 Feb 2020 09:18:23 -0600
From:   Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>
To:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>,
        John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>, Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 20/25] kmemleak: Cosmetic changes

On Mon, 2020-02-24 at 10:12 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2020-02-21 15:24:48 [-0600], zanussi@...nel.org wrote:
> > From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
> > 
> > v4.14.170-rt75-rc1 stable review patch.
> > If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> 
> This makes no sense to apply it. I updated my patch in the RT queue
> to
> what has been sent (and later merged) upstream. Then I was forced to
> sync the non-rebase branch with the rebase branch. This is the
> result.
> 
> What should be applied instead is
> 	fb2c57edcb943 ("kmemleak: Change the lock of kmemleak_object to
> raw_spinlock_t")
> 

I did apply that patch (as patch 14/25 of this series).  This patch
seemed like it was adding some comment bits mised for that one, which
is all it does.

Thanks,

Tom

> from the v4.19-RT branch.
> 
> Sebastian