[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7d68d83c-c81d-5221-b843-07adb40e4b93@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 12:59:03 -0500
From: Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>
To: Po Liu <po.liu@....com>,
Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"hauke.mehrtens@...el.com" <hauke.mehrtens@...el.com>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"allison@...utok.net" <allison@...utok.net>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"hkallweit1@...il.com" <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"saeedm@...lanox.com" <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
"andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
"f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"alexandru.ardelean@...log.com" <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com>,
"jiri@...lanox.com" <jiri@...lanox.com>,
"ayal@...lanox.com" <ayal@...lanox.com>,
"pablo@...filter.org" <pablo@...filter.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "simon.horman@...ronome.com" <simon.horman@...ronome.com>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
Alexandru Marginean <alexandru.marginean@....com>,
Xiaoliang Yang <xiaoliang.yang_1@....com>,
Roy Zang <roy.zang@....com>, Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@....com>,
Jerry Huang <jerry.huang@....com>, Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>,
Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [v1,net-next, 1/2] ethtool: add setting frame
preemption of traffic classes
Hi Po,
On 02/21/2020 10:26 PM, Po Liu wrote:
> Hi Vinicius,
>
>
> Br,
> Po Liu
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>
>> Sent: 2020年2月22日 5:44
>> To: Po Liu <po.liu@....com>; davem@...emloft.net;
>> hauke.mehrtens@...el.com; gregkh@...uxfoundation.org; allison@...utok.net;
>> tglx@...utronix.de; hkallweit1@...il.com; saeedm@...lanox.com;
>> andrew@...n.ch; f.fainelli@...il.com; alexandru.ardelean@...log.com;
>> jiri@...lanox.com; ayal@...lanox.com; pablo@...filter.org; linux-
>> kernel@...r.kernel.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org
>> Cc: simon.horman@...ronome.com; Claudiu Manoil
>> <claudiu.manoil@....com>; Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>;
>> Alexandru Marginean <alexandru.marginean@....com>; Xiaoliang Yang
>> <xiaoliang.yang_1@....com>; Roy Zang <roy.zang@....com>; Mingkai Hu
>> <mingkai.hu@....com>; Jerry Huang <jerry.huang@....com>; Leo Li
>> <leoyang.li@....com>; Po Liu <po.liu@....com>
>> Subject: [EXT] Re: [v1,net-next, 1/2] ethtool: add setting frame preemption of
>> traffic classes
>>
>> Caution: EXT Email
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Po Liu <po.liu@....com> writes:
>>
>>> IEEE Std 802.1Qbu standard defined the frame preemption of port
>>> traffic classes. This patch introduce a method to set traffic classes
>>> preemption. Add a parameter 'preemption' in struct
>>> ethtool_link_settings. The value will be translated to a binary, each
>>> bit represent a traffic class. Bit "1" means preemptable traffic
>>> class. Bit "0" means express traffic class. MSB represent high number
>>> traffic class.
>>>
>>> If hardware support the frame preemption, driver could set the
>>> ethernet device with hw_features and features with NETIF_F_PREEMPTION
>>> when initializing the port driver.
>>>
>>> User can check the feature 'tx-preemption' by command 'ethtool -k
>>> devname'. If hareware set preemption feature. The property would be a
>>> fixed value 'on' if hardware support the frame preemption.
>>> Feature would show a fixed value 'off' if hardware don't support the
>>> frame preemption.
>>>
>>> Command 'ethtool devname' and 'ethtool -s devname preemption N'
>>> would show/set which traffic classes are frame preemptable.
>>>
>>> Port driver would implement the frame preemption in the function
>>> get_link_ksettings() and set_link_ksettings() in the struct ethtool_ops.
>>>
>>
>> Any updates on this series? If you think that there's something that I could help,
>> just tell.
>
> Sorry for the long time not involve the discussion. I am focus on other tsn code for tc flower.
> If you can take more about this preemption serial, that would be good.
>
> I summary some suggestions from Marali Karicheri and Ivan Khornonzhuk and by you and also others:
It is Murali :)
> - Add config the fragment size, hold advance, release advance and flags;
- I believe hold advance, release advance values are read only
> My comments about the fragment size is in the Qbu spec limit the fragment size " the minimum non-final fragment size is 64,
> 128, 192, or 256 octets " this setting would affect the guardband setting for Qbv. But the ethtool setting could not involve this issues but by the taprio side.
> - " Furthermore, this setting could be extend for a serial setting for mac and traffic class." "Better not to using the traffic class concept."
- Couldn't understand the above? Could you please explain a bit more
on what you meant here?
Murali
> Could adding a serial setting by "ethtool --preemption xxx" or other name. I don' t think it is good to involve in the queue control since queues number may bigger than the TC number.
> - The ethtool is the better choice to configure the preemption
> I agree.
>
> Thanks!
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> --
>> Vinicius
--
Murali Karicheri
Texas Instruments
Powered by blists - more mailing lists