[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202002251206.43C6B6DA@keescook>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 12:07:07 -0800
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Vedvyas Shanbhogue <vedvyas.shanbhogue@...el.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>, x86-patch-review@...el.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v9 05/27] x86/cet/shstk: Add Kconfig option for
user-mode Shadow Stack protection
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 10:19:13AM -0800, Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
> Introduce Kconfig option: X86_INTEL_SHADOW_STACK_USER.
>
> Shadow Stack (SHSTK) provides protection against function return address
> corruption. It is active when the kernel has this feature enabled, and
> both the processor and the application support it. When this feature is
> enabled, legacy non-SHSTK applications continue to work, but without SHSTK
> protection.
>
> The user-mode SHSTK protection is only implemented for the 64-bit kernel.
> IA32 applications are supported under the compatibility mode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/Kconfig | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/Makefile | 7 +++++++
> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index 5e8949953660..6c34b701c588 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -1974,6 +1974,28 @@ config X86_INTEL_TSX_MODE_AUTO
> side channel attacks- equals the tsx=auto command line parameter.
> endchoice
>
> +config X86_INTEL_CET
> + def_bool n
> +
> +config ARCH_HAS_SHSTK
> + def_bool n
> +
> +config X86_INTEL_SHADOW_STACK_USER
> + prompt "Intel Shadow Stack for user-mode"
> + def_bool n
> + depends on CPU_SUP_INTEL && X86_64
> + select ARCH_USES_HIGH_VMA_FLAGS
> + select X86_INTEL_CET
> + select ARCH_HAS_SHSTK
> + ---help---
> + Shadow Stack (SHSTK) provides protection against program
> + stack corruption. It is active when the kernel has this
> + feature enabled, and the processor and the application
> + support it. When this feature is enabled, legacy non-SHSTK
> + applications continue to work, but without SHSTK protection.
> +
> + If unsure, say y.
> +
> config EFI
> bool "EFI runtime service support"
> depends on ACPI
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Makefile b/arch/x86/Makefile
> index 94df0868804b..c34f5befa4c8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/x86/Makefile
> @@ -149,6 +149,13 @@ ifdef CONFIG_X86_X32
> endif
> export CONFIG_X86_X32_ABI
>
> +# Check assembler Shadow Stack suppot
> +ifdef CONFIG_X86_INTEL_SHADOW_STACK_USER
> + ifeq ($(call as-instr, saveprevssp, y),)
This test needs to happen in the Kconfig rather than the Makefile; the
CONFIG should be unavailable if AS doesn't support the feature.
-Kees
> + $(error CONFIG_X86_INTEL_SHADOW_STACK_USER not supported by the assembler)
> + endif
> +endif
> +
> #
> # If the function graph tracer is used with mcount instead of fentry,
> # '-maccumulate-outgoing-args' is needed to prevent a GCC bug
> --
> 2.21.0
>
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists