linux-kernel - Re: --orphan-handling=warn (was Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/boot/compressed: Remove unnecessary sections) from bzImage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <202002242122.AA4D1B8@keescook>
Date:   Mon, 24 Feb 2020 21:35:04 -0800
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Cc:     Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>,
        Fangrui Song <maskray@...gle.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
        Michael Matz <matz@...e.de>
Subject: Re: --orphan-handling=warn (was Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/boot/compressed:
 Remove unnecessary sections) from bzImage

On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 03:20:39PM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> Kees is working on a series to just be explicit about what sections
> are ordered where, and what's discarded, which should better handle
> incompatibilities between linkers in regards to orphan section
> placement and "what does `*` mean."  Kees, that series can't come soon

So, with my series[1] applied, ld.bfd builds clean. With ld.lld, I get a
TON of warnings, such as:

(.bss.rel.ro) is being placed in '.bss.rel.ro'
(.iplt) is being placed in '.iplt'
(.plt) is being placed in '.plt'
(.rela.altinstr_aux) is being placed in '.rela.altinstr_aux'
(.rela.altinstr_replacement) is being placed in
'.rela.altinstr_replacement'
(.rela.altinstructions) is being placed in '.rela.altinstructions'
(.rela.apicdrivers) is being placed in '.rela.apicdrivers'
(.rela__bug_table) is being placed in '.rela__bug_table'
(.rela.con_initcall.init) is being placed in '.rela.init.data'
(.rela.cpuidle.text) is being placed in '.rela.text'
(.rela.data..cacheline_aligned) is being placed in '.rela.data'
(.rela.data) is being placed in '.rela.data'
(.rela.data..percpu) is being placed in '.rela.data..percpu'
(.rela.data..percpu..page_aligned) is being placed in '.rela.data..percpu'
...

But as you can see in the /DISCARD/, these (and all the others), should
be getting caught:

        /DISCARD/ : {
                *(.eh_frame)
+               *(.rela.*) *(.rela_*)
+               *(.rel.*) *(.rel_*)
+               *(.got) *(.got.*)
+               *(.igot.*) *(.iplt)
        }

I don't understand what's happening here. I haven't minimized this case
nor opened an lld bug yet.

> enough. ;) (I think it's intended to help "fine grain" (per function)
> KASLR).  More comments in the other thread.

Actually, it's rather opposed to the FGKASLR series, as for that, I need
some kind of linker script directive like this:

	/PASSTHRU/ : {
		*(.text.*)
	}

Where "PASSTHRU" would create a 1-to-1 input-section to output-section
with the same name, flags, etc.

ld.bfd's handling of orphan sections named .text.* is to put them each
as a separate output section, after the existing .text output section.

ld.lld's handling of orphan sections named .text.* is to put them into
the .text output section.

For FGKASLR (as it is currently implemented[2]), the sections need to be
individually named output sections (as bfd does it). *However*, with the
"warn on orphans" patch, FGKASLR's intentional orphaning will backfire
(I guess the warning could be turned off, but I'd like lld to handle
FGKASLR at some point.)

Note that cheating and doing the 1-to-1 mapping by handy with a 40,000
entry linker script ... made ld.lld take about 15 minutes to do the
final link. :(

> Taken from the Zen of Python, but in regards to sections in linker
> scripts, "explicit is better than implicit."

Totally agreed. I just hope there's a good solution for this PASSTHRU
idea...

-Kees

[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux.git/log/?h=linker/orphans/x86-arm
[2]
https://github.com/kaccardi/linux/commit/127111e8c6170a130d8d12d73728e74acbe05e13

-- 
Kees Cook