[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DB6PR07MB44080818D2EB925DD9F024F1EDED0@DB6PR07MB4408.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 00:14:49 +0000
From: "Varghese, Martin (Nokia - IN/Bangalore)" <martin.varghese@...ia.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"willemb@...gle.com" <willemb@...gle.com>
Subject: RE: linux-next: build warning after merge of the net-next tree
HI David & Stephen,
In v8 version of patch while fixing reverse xmas tree I wrongly judged the variable usage and removed the initialization. But wondering why compiler didn't show me that. Apologies.
David, Thanks for fixing it.
Regards,
Martin
-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2020 4:17 AM
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-next@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Varghese, Martin (Nokia - IN/Bangalore) <martin.varghese@...ia.com>; willemb@...gle.com
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the net-next tree
Hi Dave,
On Mon, 24 Feb 2020 14:42:43 -0800 (PST) David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>
> Sorry, my compiler didn't show this.
Yeah, these ones especially change with compiler version. I am currently running gcc v9.2.1 if it matters.
> I've committed the following into net-next, hopefully it does the trick:
Thanks.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Powered by blists - more mailing lists