[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGb2v64g7Q4e+ic08pA7tbamgToOjyYzuzqP0bpqBZjRuRUrPA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 16:52:18 +0800
From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] drm/sun4i: de2: Don't return de2_fmt_info struct
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 4:35 PM Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 06:39:00PM +0100, Jernej Skrabec wrote:
> > Now that de2_fmt_info contains only DRM <-> HW format mapping, it
> > doesn't make sense to return pointer to structure when searching by DRM
> > format. Rework that to return only HW format instead.
> >
> > This doesn't make any functional change.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun8i_mixer.c | 15 +++++++++++----
> > drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun8i_mixer.h | 7 +------
> > drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun8i_ui_layer.c | 10 +++++-----
> > drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun8i_vi_layer.c | 12 ++++++------
> > 4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun8i_mixer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun8i_mixer.c
> > index e078ec96de2d..56cc037fd312 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun8i_mixer.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun8i_mixer.c
> > @@ -27,6 +27,11 @@
> > #include "sun8i_vi_layer.h"
> > #include "sunxi_engine.h"
> >
> > +struct de2_fmt_info {
> > + u32 drm_fmt;
> > + u32 de2_fmt;
> > +};
> > +
> > static const struct de2_fmt_info de2_formats[] = {
> > {
> > .drm_fmt = DRM_FORMAT_ARGB8888,
> > @@ -230,15 +235,17 @@ static const struct de2_fmt_info de2_formats[] = {
> > },
> > };
> >
> > -const struct de2_fmt_info *sun8i_mixer_format_info(u32 format)
> > +int sun8i_mixer_drm_format_to_hw(u32 format, u32 *hw_format)
> > {
> > unsigned int i;
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(de2_formats); ++i)
> > - if (de2_formats[i].drm_fmt == format)
> > - return &de2_formats[i];
> > + if (de2_formats[i].drm_fmt == format) {
> > + *hw_format = de2_formats[i].de2_fmt;
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> >
> > - return NULL;
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > }
>
> I'm not too sure about that one. It breaks the consistency with the
> other functions, and I don't really see a particular benefit to it?
I guess we could just define an "invalid" value, and have the function
return that if can't find a match? I'm guessing 0x0 is valid, so maybe
0xffffffff or 0xdeadbeef ?
That would keep consistency with everything else all the while
removing the level of indirection you wanted to.
ChenYu
> The rest of the series is
> Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
>
> Maxime
Powered by blists - more mailing lists