[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <681404C7-9015-4C64-B8FE-2C93D75A7318@canonical.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 17:42:26 +0800
From: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
zdai@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
"open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:INTEL ETHERNET DRIVERS"
<intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
zdai@...ibm.com, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] e1000e: Use rtnl_lock to prevent race conditions
between net and pci/pm
Hi Greg,
> On Oct 8, 2019, at 01:27, Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com> wrote:
>
> From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...ux.intel.com>
>
> This patch is meant to address possible race conditions that can exist
> between network configuration and power management. A similar issue was
> fixed for igb in commit 9474933caf21 ("igb: close/suspend race in
> netif_device_detach").
>
> In addition it consolidates the code so that the PCI error handling code
> will essentially perform the power management freeze on the device prior to
> attempting a reset, and will thaw the device afterwards if that is what it
> is planning to do. Otherwise when we call close on the interface it should
> see it is detached and not attempt to call the logic to down the interface
> and free the IRQs again.
>
>> From what I can tell the check that was adding the check for __E1000_DOWN
> in e1000e_close was added when runtime power management was added. However
> it should not be relevant for us as we perform a call to
> pm_runtime_get_sync before we call e1000_down/free_irq so it should always
> be back up before we call into this anyway.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...ux.intel.com>
Please merge this commit, a7023819404ac9bd2bb311a4fafd38515cfa71ec to stable v5.14.
`modprobe -r e1000e` triggers a null pointer dereference [1] after the the following two patches are applied to v5.4.y:
d635e7c4b34e6a630c7a1e8f1a8fd52c3e3ceea7 e1000e: Revert "e1000e: Make watchdog use delayed work"
21c6137939723ed6f5e4aec7882cdfc247304c27 e1000e: Drop unnecessary __E1000_DOWN bit twiddling
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864303
Kai-Heng
> ---
>
> RFC v2: Dropped some unused variables
> Added logic to check for device present before removing to pm_freeze
> Fixed misplaced err_irq to before rtnl_unlock()
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 40 +++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> index d7d56e42a6aa..8b4e589aca36 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> @@ -4715,12 +4715,12 @@ int e1000e_close(struct net_device *netdev)
>
> pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev);
>
> - if (!test_bit(__E1000_DOWN, &adapter->state)) {
> + if (netif_device_present(netdev)) {
> e1000e_down(adapter, true);
> e1000_free_irq(adapter);
>
> /* Link status message must follow this format */
> - pr_info("%s NIC Link is Down\n", adapter->netdev->name);
> + pr_info("%s NIC Link is Down\n", netdev->name);
> }
>
> napi_disable(&adapter->napi);
> @@ -6298,10 +6298,14 @@ static int e1000e_pm_freeze(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct net_device *netdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
> + bool present;
>
> + rtnl_lock();
> +
> + present = netif_device_present(netdev);
> netif_device_detach(netdev);
>
> - if (netif_running(netdev)) {
> + if (present && netif_running(netdev)) {
> int count = E1000_CHECK_RESET_COUNT;
>
> while (test_bit(__E1000_RESETTING, &adapter->state) && count--)
> @@ -6313,6 +6317,8 @@ static int e1000e_pm_freeze(struct device *dev)
> e1000e_down(adapter, false);
> e1000_free_irq(adapter);
> }
> + rtnl_unlock();
> +
> e1000e_reset_interrupt_capability(adapter);
>
> /* Allow time for pending master requests to run */
> @@ -6626,27 +6632,31 @@ static int __e1000_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> static int e1000e_pm_thaw(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct net_device *netdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
> + int rc = 0;
>
> e1000e_set_interrupt_capability(adapter);
> - if (netif_running(netdev)) {
> - u32 err = e1000_request_irq(adapter);
>
> - if (err)
> - return err;
> + rtnl_lock();
> + if (netif_running(netdev)) {
> + rc = e1000_request_irq(adapter);
> + if (rc)
> + goto err_irq;
>
> e1000e_up(adapter);
> }
>
> netif_device_attach(netdev);
> +err_irq:
> + rtnl_unlock();
>
> - return 0;
> + return rc;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> static int e1000e_pm_suspend(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> @@ -6818,16 +6828,11 @@ static void e1000_netpoll(struct net_device *netdev)
> static pci_ers_result_t e1000_io_error_detected(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> pci_channel_state_t state)
> {
> - struct net_device *netdev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> - struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
> -
> - netif_device_detach(netdev);
> + e1000e_pm_freeze(&pdev->dev);
>
> if (state == pci_channel_io_perm_failure)
> return PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT;
>
> - if (netif_running(netdev))
> - e1000e_down(adapter, true);
> pci_disable_device(pdev);
>
> /* Request a slot slot reset. */
> @@ -6893,10 +6898,7 @@ static void e1000_io_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>
> e1000_init_manageability_pt(adapter);
>
> - if (netif_running(netdev))
> - e1000e_up(adapter);
> -
> - netif_device_attach(netdev);
> + e1000e_pm_thaw(&pdev->dev);
>
> /* If the controller has AMT, do not set DRV_LOAD until the interface
> * is up. For all other cases, let the f/w know that the h/w is now
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists