[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6523119a-50ac-973a-d1cd-ab1569259411@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 10:04:33 +0000
From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Bitan Biswas <bbiswas@...dia.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
CC: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
<lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: LKFT: arm x15: mmc1: cache flush error -110
On 24/02/2020 11:16, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> + Adrian
>
> On Fri, 21 Feb 2020 at 20:44, Bitan Biswas <bbiswas@...dia.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 2/21/20 1:48 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 at 18:54, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 19 Feb 2020 at 21:54, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 13 Feb 2020 at 16:43, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Try to restore the value for the cache flush timeout, by updating the
>>>>> define MMC_CACHE_FLUSH_TIMEOUT_MS to 10 * 60 * 1000".
>>>>
>>>> I have increased the timeout to 10 minutes but it did not help.
>>>> Same error found.
>>>> [ 608.679353] mmc1: Card stuck being busy! mmc_poll_for_busy
>>>> [ 608.684964] mmc1: cache flush error -110
>>>> [ 608.689005] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev mmcblk1, sector
>>>> 4302400 op 0x1:(WRITE) flags 0x20800 phys_seg 1 prio class 0
>>>>
>>>> OTOH, What best i could do for my own experiment to revert all three patches and
>>>> now the reported error gone and device mount successfully [1].
>>>>
>>>> List of patches reverted,
>>>> mmc: core: Specify timeouts for BKOPS and CACHE_FLUSH for eMMC
>>>> mmc: block: Use generic_cmd6_time when modifying
>>>> INAND_CMD38_ARG_EXT_CSD
>>>> mmc: core: Default to generic_cmd6_time as timeout in __mmc_switch()
Reverting all the above also fixes the problem for me.
>> I find that from the commit the changes in mmc_flush_cache below is
>> the cause.
>>
>> ##
>> @@ -961,7 +963,8 @@ int mmc_flush_cache(struct mmc_card *card)
>> (card->ext_csd.cache_size > 0) &&
>> (card->ext_csd.cache_ctrl & 1)) {
>> err = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL,
>> - EXT_CSD_FLUSH_CACHE, 1, 0);
>> + EXT_CSD_FLUSH_CACHE, 1,
>> + MMC_CACHE_FLUSH_TIMEOUT_MS);
I no longer see the issue on reverting the above hunk as Bitan suggested
but now I see the following (which is expected) ...
WARNING KERN mmc1: unspecified timeout for CMD6 - use generic
> Just as a quick sanity test, please try the below patch, which
> restores the old cache flush timeout to 10min.
>
> However, as I indicated above, this seems to be a problem that needs
> to be fixed at in the host driver side. For the sdhci driver, there is
> a bit of a tricky logic around how to deal with timeouts in
> sdhci_send_command(). My best guess is that's where we should look
> more closely (and I am doing that).
>
> From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 11:43:33 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] mmc: core: Restore busy timeout for eMMC cache flushing
>
> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c
> index da425ee2d9bf..713e7dd6d028 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c
> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
>
> #define MMC_OPS_TIMEOUT_MS (10 * 60 * 1000) /* 10min*/
> #define MMC_BKOPS_TIMEOUT_MS (120 * 1000) /* 120s */
> -#define MMC_CACHE_FLUSH_TIMEOUT_MS (30 * 1000) /* 30s */
> +#define MMC_CACHE_FLUSH_TIMEOUT_MS (10 * 60 * 1000) /* 10min */
This does not fix the problem for me.
Jon
--
nvpublic
Powered by blists - more mailing lists