[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200225192304.f3ccd36bd1c451e3a1969255@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 19:23:04 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 25 (BOOT_CONFIG)
On Mon, 24 Feb 2020 22:58:01 -0800
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
> On 2/24/20 7:24 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20200224:
> >
>
>
> on i386:
>
> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for BOOT_CONFIG
> Depends on [n]: BLK_DEV_INITRD [=n]
> Selected by [y]:
> - BOOTTIME_TRACING [=y] && TRACING_SUPPORT [=y] && FTRACE [=y] && TRACING [=y]
Oops, thanks for reporting!
So I made the Boottime tracing selects the bootconfig, but the bootconfig depends on initrd support.
Hmm, should I make BOOTTIME_TRACING depends on BLK_DEV_INITRD??
Thank you,
>
>
> Full randconfig file is attached.
>
> --
> ~Randy
> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists