[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d13c63f5-35f6-129b-a3b8-61cb9ae5369d@web.de>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 12:10:21 +0100
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tim Bird <Tim.Bird@...y.com>,
Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [for-next][12/26] Documentation: bootconfig: Add a doc for
extended boot config
>> The file format will trigger specific parsing efforts.
>
> Maybe. If someone is interested in expanding their command, (e.g. vim)
> they can use EBNF to understand syntax,
I hope so.
> or directly reuse lib/bootconfig.c which provides a compact parser. :)
I see some development challenges according to this design direction.
This software component is using programming interfaces from
the Linux kernel, isn't it?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/lib/bootconfig.c?id=c99b17ac03994525092fd66bed14b4a0c82f0b4d#n9
I guess that other approaches should be considered for the desired
software reuse in this system configuration area.
Is there a need to map key and value combinations directly to files
(and directories) for a more convenient data processing by user-space processes?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists