lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 16:25:34 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>, Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com> Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>, Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/61] KVM: x86: Introduce KVM cpu caps On 25/02/20 16:18, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > Would it be better or worse if we eliminate set_supported_cpuid() hook > completely by doing an ugly hack like (completely untested): Yes, it makes sense. Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists