linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/61] KVM: x86: Introduce KVM cpu caps

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a52b3d92-5df6-39bd-f3e7-2cdd4f3be6cb@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 25 Feb 2020 16:25:34 +0100
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Cc:     Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/61] KVM: x86: Introduce KVM cpu caps

On 25/02/20 16:18, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Would it be better or worse if we eliminate set_supported_cpuid() hook
> completely by doing an ugly hack like (completely untested):

Yes, it makes sense.

Paolo