linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH -next] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: fix build error without CONFIG_DEBUG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BN8PR11MB362069564569B69E42C00086F2ED0@BN8PR11MB3620.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Tue, 25 Feb 2020 17:10:46 +0000
From:   "Kammela, Gayatri" <gayatri.kammela@...el.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@...wei.com>
CC:     Rajneesh Bhardwaj <rajneesh.bhardwaj@...el.com>,
        "Somayaji, Vishwanath" <vishwanath.somayaji@...el.com>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        "Andy Shevchenko" <andy@...radead.org>,
        Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH -next] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: fix build error
 without CONFIG_DEBUG_FS

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2020 2:13 AM
> To: Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@...wei.com>; Kammela, Gayatri
> <gayatri.kammela@...el.com>
> Cc: Rajneesh Bhardwaj <rajneesh.bhardwaj@...el.com>; Somayaji,
> Vishwanath <vishwanath.somayaji@...el.com>; Darren Hart
> <dvhart@...radead.org>; Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>;
> Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>; Linux Kernel Mailing
> List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: fix build error
> without CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
> 
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 5:40 AM Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@...wei.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > If CONFIG_DEBUG_FS is n, build fails:
> >
> > drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.c: In function pmc_core_resume:
> > drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.c:1327:3: error: implicit declaration
> of function pmc_core_slps0_display; did you mean
> pmc_core_is_pc10_failed? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> >    pmc_core_slps0_display(pmcdev, dev, NULL);
> >       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> > Function pmc_core_slps0_display() is responsible for displaying debug
> > registers, which is under CONFIG_DEBUG_FS.
> >
> > Providing the static inline stub whenever CONFIG_DEBUG_FS is disabled
> > to fix this. Function pmc_core_lpm_display() is the same.
> 
> Thank you for the patch, but I think it's not the right approach.
> Basically we need to move those functions outside of #if
> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS).
> (Move them upper).
Agreed
> 
> Also I have noticed another issue in pmc_core_lpm_display(). It uses
> tgl_lpm_maps directly. It shouldn't.
> 
> Cc: Gayatri.
> 
> Gayatri, care to fix?
Hi Andy, caught this bug in our internal regression too. I will send the patch shortly. Thanks!
> 
> > Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@...wei.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.c
> > b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.c
> > index f4a36fb..939f8e0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_core.c
> > @@ -1117,6 +1117,20 @@ static void pmc_core_dbgfs_register(struct
> pmc_dev *pmcdev)
> >         }
> >  }
> >  #else
> > +static inline void pmc_core_slps0_display(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev,
> > +                                          struct device *dev,
> > +                                          struct seq_file *s) { }
> > +
> > +static inline void pmc_core_lpm_display(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev,
> > +                                        struct device *dev,
> > +                                        struct seq_file *s, u32 offset,
> > +                                        const char *str,
> > +                                        const struct pmc_bit_map
> > +**maps) { }
> > +
> >  static inline void pmc_core_dbgfs_register(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev)  {
> > }
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> >
> 
> 
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko