[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu_FJeiaY5yw9=ER4XyBZrDFZ5L4igrqxP6hhJ7Z8easpw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 18:45:06 +0100
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
linux-efi <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/efi: Add additional efi tables for unencrypted
mapping checks
On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 at 18:41, Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com> wrote:
>
> When booting with SME active, EFI tables must be mapped unencrypted since
> they were built by UEFI in unencrypted memory. Update the list of tables
> to be checked during early_memremap() processing to account for new EFI
> tables.
>
> This fixes a bug where an EFI TPM log table has been created by UEFI, but
> it lives in memory that has been marked as usable rather than reserved.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> - Re-spun against EFI tree
Which one? Surely not the one in the link I included?
> ---
> arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
> index 43b24e149312..c6ca959e2366 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
> @@ -88,6 +88,9 @@ static const unsigned long * const efi_tables[] = {
> #ifdef CONFIG_EFI_RCI2_TABLE
> &rci2_table_phys,
> #endif
> + &efi.rng_seed,
> + &efi.tpm_log,
> + &efi.tpm_final_log,
> };
>
> u64 efi_setup; /* efi setup_data physical address */
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists