lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 25 Feb 2020 13:14:32 -0500
From:   Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, aik@...abs.ru,
        david@...son.dropbear.id.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        nayna@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, gcwilson@...ux.ibm.com, jgg@...pe.ca
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] tpm: ibmvtpm: Wait for buffer to be set before
 proceeding

On 2/25/20 11:57 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 03:23:27PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
>> From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
>>
>> Synchronize with the results from the CRQs before continuing with
>> the initialization. This avoids trying to send TPM commands while
>> the rtce buffer has not been allocated, yet.
> What is CRQ anyway an acronym of?

Command request queue.


>
>> This patch fixes an existing race condition that may occurr if the
>> hypervisor does not quickly respond to the VTPM_GET_RTCE_BUFFER_SIZE
>> request sent during initialization and therefore the ibmvtpm->rtce_buf
>> has not been allocated at the time the first TPM command is sent.
> If it fixes a race condition, why doesn't it have a fixes tag?

Which commit should I mention?

   Stefan


>
> /Jarkko


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ