[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <jhjftex438f.fsf@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 18:24:26 +0000
From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
To: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@....com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
maz@...nel.org, suzuki.poulose@....com, sudeep.holla@....com,
lukasz.luba@....com, dietmar.eggemann@....com, rjw@...ysocki.net,
pkondeti@...eaurora.org, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] arm64: ARMv8.4 Activity Monitors support
Hi Ionela,
On Wed, Feb 26 2020, Ionela Voinescu wrote:
> v4 -> v5:
> - v4 can be found at [6]
> - [1/7] rebased on top of latest tip/sched/core and fixed conflicts;
> applied Reviewed-by from Valentin;
> - [5/7] applied Reviewed-by from Valentin
> - [6/7] applied Valentin and Pavan's suggested fixes; reworked
> arch_cpu_freq_counters (now arch_freq_counters_available) and
> confined it to the arch topology driver as recommended by Valentin
> and Lukasz;
>
I don't really have any more comments for v5. AFAICT what we are missing
now is Sudeep's ack for the arch_topology bits, and if Catalin / Will
are okay with it I think this can all go through the arm64 tree.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists