lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87eeuhp0aw.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:   Wed, 26 Feb 2020 21:21:11 +0100
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [patch 16/16] x86/entry: Disable interrupts in IDTENTRY

Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> writes:

> On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 11:33:37PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> Not all exceptions guarantee to return with interrupts disabled. Disable
>> them in idtentry_exit() which is invoked on all regular (non IST) exception
>> entry points. Preparatory patch for further consolidation of the return
>> code.
>
> ISTR a patch that undoes cond_local_irq_enable() in the various trap
> handlers. Did that get lost or is that still on the TODO list
> somewhere?

Hmm. I ditched it after we decided that fixing the #PF cases is ugly as
hell. Lemme find that stuff again.

> Once we do that, this can turn into an assertion that IRQs are in fact
> disabled.

Right.

Thanks,

        tglx

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ